For your team · Leadership Crucible

Leadership Crucible

Leadership & Organizational Behavior · Leadership & Organizational Behavior

Navigate leadership transitions, organizational dynamics, and ethical pressure across 5 high-stakes years.

Leadership Crucible drops each team into a leadership role at an organization mid-transition. The first year is a transition — a beloved long-tenured predecessor has just departed, direct reports are still loyal to them, and the board is watching. Over 5 years the team makes decisions on talent, ethics, communications, and operations while organizational dynamics (board politics, cultural friction, employee morale) compound. Random events skew personal: a key hire threatens to leave, a board member leaks to the press, an ethics issue surfaces. What distinguishes this sim is the Crisis Escalation Chain — a poorly handled crisis doesn't just hurt this year, it spreads across pillars and returns harder in future years — plus an Adapt window each week where teams can revise up to 2 decisions after seeing the crisis event.

Ctrl / Cmd + P to print or save as PDF

Learning objectives

  • Make people-and-culture decisions with the same rigor as financial ones.
  • Apply leadership theory (Heifetz adaptive leadership, Edmondson psychological safety, Goleman EQ) to specific situations.
  • Read a crisis event and use the Adapt window to revise decisions with new information.
  • Hold a position under pressure — and know when to revise it.
  • Communicate decisions transparently when stakeholders disagree.
  • Read organizational signals (morale dips, voluntary attrition, board tension) and act before they escalate.

The loop

  1. 1
    Year briefing
    Last year's outcomes and the new pressure points on the org are laid out.
  2. 2
    Decisions
    Each team picks 5-6 leadership moves — most are people decisions: hires, culture, communications, ethics.
  3. 3
    Crisis event
    A leadership crucible moment hits (resignation, board leak, ethics flag). The event's severity is tiered by the team's trajectory — teams on the way up get de-escalated events, teams sliding get escalated ones.
  4. 4
    Adapt
    After seeing the crisis, the team may revise up to 2 of its original decisions. This is the leadership moment: what do you change, and what do you defend?
  5. 5
    Results
    Team Morale, Decision Quality, Organizational Trust, and Operational Stability move; a class-scoped debrief report is written.
  6. 6
    Reflection
    Each student writes a pre- and post-decision reflection — graded by word count and completion for individual contribution.

Pillars & scoring

Every team is scored on four pillars that compound across the sim. They aggregate into a composite the leaderboard ranks by, and the professor can see per-pillar deltas in the gradebook.

Team Morale

How energized and bought-in the team is. Empathetic, people-first decisions score higher.

Decision Quality

How well decisions hold up to scrutiny and consequences — the Adapt window compounds into this pillar.

Organizational Trust

Whether employees, board, and external stakeholders still trust leadership to do what they said.

Operational Stability

Whether the day-to-day still works under all this change.

Hero features

  • Crisis Escalation Chain

    Poorly handled crisis events don't end at year-end — they spread. Tier 1 contained, Tier 2 spreading, Tier 3 systemic, with compounding damage across pillars. Trajectory-tiered: teams improving get de-escalated events; teams declining get escalated ones.

  • Adapt window

    After the crisis event fires, teams get a bounded second chance to revise up to 2 decisions. The core teaching moment — read the situation again and decide what to change.

  • Industry tracks

    SaaS, Bank, Nonprofit, Hospital — each industry reframes the leadership challenges with its own company foundation, board makeup, direct reports, and crisis mix.

  • Personal reflection grading

    Pre- and post-decision written reflections drive individual-contribution scores — 40% participation, 40% reflection, 20% timeliness. Leadership courses live or die on whether students could articulate their own stance.

Fit & format

Pacing

5-week intensive · 8-week standard · 14-week semester.

Cohort shape

Designed for ~15-30 students in teams of 4-6.

Best for

MBA leadership courses, executive education, undergraduate org behavior, ethics & leadership capstones.

Differentiator

The only sim built around a Crisis Escalation Chain and an Adapt window. Decisions are people-and-culture-shaped rather than strategic — what to say, who to keep, how to lead through messy moments — and poor handling this year returns harder next year.

Sample discussion prompt

One of many pre-authored prompts from the sim’s Year 1 closelibrary. Grounded in the team’s actual decisions and used as a scheduled teaching moment.

Year 1 close

The predecessor's ghost

Your direct reports keep referencing the person who was in your seat before you. Was that a signal to preserve their approach, differentiate from it, or something more nuanced? Which of your Y1 decisions was shaped by the predecessor's legacy — and did that shape it well?

LMS

Canvas, Blackboard, Brightspace, Moodle via LTI 1.3. Students launch from your LMS with single sign-on; one-click grade publish posts scores back with the rubric breakdown as the comment.

Pricing
$20 / student
$10 / student for Founding Faculty, locked 2 years

Per semester. No platform fee, no per-section charge, no seat minimums. Institutional invoicing available.

Talk to usFull marketing pageAll sims (overview)