For your team · The Closing Cycle

The Closing Cycle

Accounting & Monthly Close · Accounting & Monthly Close

Run the monthly close. Accruals, reconciliations, judgments, audit asks — period after period.

The Closing Cycle adapts the continuous-operations model to monthly close work. Every active day, the inbox surfaces 2-5 close events from senior accountants, the controller, audit managers, legal, HR, and IT: a late vendor invoice three days post-close, a reconciliation out by $87K, a warranty accrual that needs reassessment, a PCAOB inspection letter, an ERP outage 48 hours before publish. Some events are multiple-choice with explicit consequences across the four pillars; others ask for a written response (accrual methodology memo, investigation plan, audit response) that a senior controller / audit partner LLM grades on technical accuracy, process discipline, and audit readiness. Persistent state tracks four pillars and counters for closes completed, material errors, events expired. The simulation models what students rarely see in case studies: the actual rhythm and judgment of closing books under real time pressure.

Ctrl / Cmd + P to print or save as PDF

Learning objectives

  • Execute monthly close on a real timeline, not as a static case.
  • Make appropriate judgment calls on accruals, reserves, and adjustments — defend them.
  • Reconcile and investigate variances quickly without cutting corners.
  • Defend close decisions to the audit team with the right framework.
  • Build muscle for the closing rhythm itself — the cadence and discipline real accountants live in.

The loop

  1. 1
    Inbox arrival
    Cron fires close events on every active day. Accruals, recs, adjustments, review, reporting, audit, process.
  2. 2
    Triage
    A reconciliation out of balance can't wait; a process question can. Pick what gets full attention.
  3. 3
    Choose or write
    Choice events show consequence deltas; written events demand a real accounting memo.
  4. 4
    Watch state move
    Close discipline, issue resolution, audit readiness, reporting accuracy — every response shifts them.
  5. 5
    Repeat
    Daily rhythm of close-cycle judgment under audit-level scrutiny.

Pillars & scoring

Every team is scored on four pillars that compound across the sim. They aggregate into a composite the leaderboard ranks by, and the professor can see per-pillar deltas in the gradebook.

Close Discipline

On-time closes, documented methodology, minimal suspense balances and out-of-period adjustments.

Issue Resolution

Fix breaks fast, escalate intelligently, don't kick the can.

Audit Readiness

Workpapers, methodologies, and judgments that withstand auditor scrutiny.

Reporting Accuracy

The numbers in the board package match reality. No surprises later.

Hero features

  • Senior controller / audit partner grader

    Written responses graded by Claude as a senior controller or audit partner — judges technical accuracy, process discipline, and audit readiness.

  • Persistent close state

    Tracks closes completed, material errors, events expired across many periods — long-term reputation matters.

  • Audit-level rubric

    Grader anchored to real GAAP / audit framing, not generic management feedback. Students get accounting-grade feedback.

  • Flexible cadence

    Professor picks active days, events per day, response window, total length (up to 16 weeks).

Fit & format

Pacing

Flexible — typical: 5-6 weeks Mon-Fri at 3 events/day. The engine ticks per sim-day; a cosmetic "Close Cycle X of N" label surfaces the day-of-N framing rather than a batched monthly close.

Cohort shape

Designed for ~15-30 students in teams of 4-5. Each team runs one persistent close team.

Best for

Graduate or upper-undergraduate accounting courses, controllership and audit electives, accounting capstones.

Differentiator

The only sim built around the rhythm of accounting work. Case studies teach standards; this teaches the lived experience of closing books under time pressure with auditor scrutiny.

Sample discussion prompt

One of many pre-authored prompts from the sim’s Week 1 debrieflibrary. Grounded in the team’s actual decisions and used as a scheduled teaching moment.

Week 1 debrief

The late invoice — accrue or hold?

A vendor invoice arrived after close cutoff this week. Show us your team's memo. Did you accrue, hold in next period, or push back on the vendor? What is your team's materiality threshold, and did the memo reference it?

Sample decision

A single in-tray event drawn from the sim’s live event catalog — the kind of decision a student team sees in their inbox on any given active day.

From: Yuki Tanaka · Senior Accountant

Vendor invoice arrived 3 days post close

A $42K legal invoice for services rendered in close period arrived 3 days after we closed the period. Materiality threshold is $25K. Adjust the prior period? Book in current? Both have implications.

  • Reopen prior period; book correctly
    Restates the closed period; highest fidelity to when expense was incurred.
  • Book in current period as out-of-period adjustment
    Avoids reopening books; relies on materiality memo for support.
  • Wait until quarter close to address
    Defers handling to a wider materiality window; leaves the item visible to auditors as an open accrual.
LMS

Canvas, Blackboard, Brightspace, Moodle via LTI 1.3. Students launch from your LMS with single sign-on; one-click grade publish posts scores back with the rubric breakdown as the comment.

Pricing
$20 / student
$10 / student for Founding Faculty, locked 2 years

Per semester. No platform fee, no per-section charge, no seat minimums. Institutional invoicing available.

Talk to usFull marketing pageAll sims (overview)